16 January 2024
Rakshit and ors -v- HMRC
Each taxpayer challenged the validity of SDLT closure notices on the grounds that HMRC had failed to enquire into both of the SDLT returns they had submitted in relation to the arrangements, and also challenged the validity of assessments issued by HMRC in relation to the same liabilities.
The Tribunal has held that:
- The taxpayers were not estopped from arguing that the enquiry notices were invalid;
- Read in context, a reasonable taxpayer would have been informed of HMRC’s intention to enquire into both returns;
- The assessments were not issued within the relevant time limit because the taxpayers had submitted a return in relation to the relevant land transaction, notwithstanding that liability arose under s75A.
For the Appellants: Thomas Chacko, counsel, instructed by Spector Constant & Williams
For the Respondents: Ben Elliott, counsel, instructed by the General Counsel and Solicitor to HM Revenue and Customs
A copy of the decision can be found by clicking the following link
This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of PCTC or by PCTC as a whole.
