28 February 2017
UT Decision: HMRC v Romie Tager QC
PROCEDURE— penalty imposed in accordance with FA 2008, Sch 36, para 50 — parties agreed that decision records incorrect amount — correction made — whether jurisdiction to admit further evidence to support reduction in penalty following publication of decision — no — whether, if jurisdiction assumed, evidence should be admitted — no.
David Yates, Counsel, instructed by the General Counsel and Solicitor to HM Revenue and Customs, for the applicants.
To see the approved Decision, click here.
This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of PCTC or by PCTC as a whole.