The focus of this matrimonial dispute was whether certain trust assets were capital resources available to H and, if so, what was their net value and did they constitute in whole or part matrimonial assets to which the equal sharing principal in s25 Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 applies.
David Ewart KC and Emma Chamberlain were both involved in this case for different parties.
You can read the judgment here.
This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of PCTC or by PCTC as a whole.
